This page may contain affiliate links.
Some links on this page are affiliate links, meaning I may earn a commission if you sign up (at no extra cost to you). This never influences my ratings or recommendations.
As of July 2026 the pricing page carries no dollar figure for Solo, Pro or Enterprise, so evaluating it starts with a sales call and billing is metered by tasks after that. The eight tools below all work the same territory, tracking how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI describe your brand, and most of them publish what they charge.
Why Switch
Why people look for AirOps alternatives
AirOps publishes no price for any plan, so you cannot compare it against a $99 or $250 competitor without booking a demo first.
Billing is metered in tasks on top of the plan fee, which makes the monthly number move with usage.
You want tracking and reporting rather than a full content production platform, and you already have writers.
You need agent access on the entry tier, and several tools here ship MCP and an API on their cheapest plan.
You want to prove the channel matters before committing budget, which a free tier or a published $29 plan lets you do.
Alternatives
Best AirOps alternatives
8 alternatives ranked.
Profound
Top PickTeams that want the most established AI-visibility analytics platform and can start on a single engine.
AI search visibility platform tracking how your brand shows up across ChatGPT, Perplexity and other AI engines.
Why consider Profound
Profound is the most established AI-visibility platform I track and the highest rated at 8.4/10. Where AirOps hides every price, Profound publishes a $99/mo entry, so you can size the decision before booking a call.
Pros
- +Highest-rated AI visibility tool on this site at 8.4/10
- +Published entry price at $99/mo, unlike AirOps
- +Both a REST API and an MCP server for agent access
Cons
- −The $99 Starter tier covers ChatGPT only; Growth is $399/mo
- −Analytics-first, so it does not ship content the way AirOps does
Conductor
Enterprise teams that want AI search folded into a full organic search platform with SSO and account management.
Enterprise AEO and SEO platform combining AI visibility tracking, content generation and site monitoring.
Why consider Conductor
Conductor is the closest like-for-like swap if you are shopping AirOps at enterprise scale: AI search and traditional SEO in one platform, with an API and MCP server. Be ready for the same sales process, since it does not publish prices either.
Pros
- +Covers traditional SEO and AI search in one platform
- +REST API and an MCP server for programmatic access
- +Enterprise footing: SSO, RBAC and dedicated support
Cons
- −No published pricing at any tier, the same problem you have with AirOps
- −Heavier and broader than a focused AEO tool, so expect a longer rollout
PromptWatch
Teams that want to drive AI-visibility data from Claude or Cursor and prove the value before paying anything.
AI visibility and GEO platform with a free tier and a 59-tool MCP server plus REST API on every plan.
Why consider PromptWatch
PromptWatch is the pick if agent access is the point. A 59-tool MCP server and REST API come on every plan including the free tier, so you can wire AI visibility into Claude or Cursor and pay nothing until it earns its place.
Pros
- +Free Explore tier, so you can test before spending
- +59-tool MCP server plus REST API on every plan, including free
- +Published ladder: $95 Essential, $245 Professional, $579 Business
Cons
- −Tracking and analysis rather than AirOps' content execution
- −No Playbook or agent layer that publishes work for you
Peec AI
Marketing teams that want clean visibility analytics with agent access included at the entry price.
AI search visibility analytics tracking your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with MCP on every paid plan.
Why consider Peec AI
Peec AI gives you MCP on every paid plan and a clean three-tier ladder from $95/mo. It does less than AirOps by design: analytics without the content machine, which is the right trade if you already have writers.
Pros
- +MCP on every paid plan, no tier-gating
- +Rated 7.8/10 here, with a clear three-tier ladder ($95 / $245 / $495)
- +Focused product with little to configure before it is useful
Cons
- −Tracks three engines, narrower than the platforms above
- −No content generation, so it reports rather than acts
Temso AI
Small teams that want the track-then-act loop AirOps sells, at a price they can approve without a meeting.
Closed-loop AEO platform that tracks AI search visibility and runs an AI agent to act on it, with a REST API.
Why consider Temso AI
Temso AI is the closest thing here to AirOps' actual model, tracking AI search then running an agent against what it finds. At $29/mo it is a fraction of what an AirOps quote is likely to be.
Pros
- +Closest match to AirOps' agent model on this list
- +Starts at $29/mo with a published ladder
- +REST API and an MCP server for your own stack
Cons
- −Growth jumps to $199/mo and Professional to $499/mo
- −Younger and smaller than the platforms above, with a shorter track record
LLM Pulse
Teams that want the widest model coverage on this list for the lowest entry price.
AI search visibility tracker with a hosted MCP server and REST API, monitoring your brand across 10+ AI models.
Why consider LLM Pulse
LLM Pulse tracks 10+ AI models, the widest coverage on this list, and includes a hosted MCP server plus REST API on paid plans. At €49/mo it is the cheapest way to watch a broad model spread.
Pros
- +Tracks 10+ AI models, broader than most tools here
- +Hosted MCP server and REST API on paid plans
- +Cheapest serious entry point at €49/mo
Cons
- −Priced in euros, so budget for currency swings
- −Scale tier jumps to €299/mo once you outgrow Growth at €99
Rankshift
Teams tracking a wide model spread that do not need agent access on the entry tier.
AI search visibility tracker covering 9 LLMs, with an MCP server and REST API from its Professional plan.
Why consider Rankshift
Rankshift covers 9 LLMs from $82/mo. Worth knowing before you compare: its MCP server and REST API only unlock on the $189/mo Professional plan, where AirOps includes MCP with the platform.
Pros
- +Covers 9 major LLMs
- +Published ladder from $82/mo
- +MCP server and REST API once you reach Professional
Cons
- −MCP and API are gated: they start at Professional, $189/mo
- −Business tier is a steep step up at $425/mo
SE Visible
Teams that already trust SE Ranking for SEO and want AI visibility from a vendor with a real track record.
AI search visibility tracker from the SE Ranking team, monitoring your brand across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.
Why consider SE Visible
SE Visible comes from the SE Ranking team, so it carries a track record most tools in this category do not have yet. There is a REST API but no MCP server, so agent access is API-only.
Pros
- +Built by the SE Ranking team, so it is not a first product
- +Rated 8.1/10 here, with a published ladder from $99/mo
- +REST API for pulling data into your own reporting
Cons
- −No MCP server, so agent access runs through the API only
- −Tracks three engines rather than the wider spread some rivals cover
Checklist
What to look for in an alternative
Start with what you are actually buying. AirOps sells execution: Quill runs Playbooks, Grids process content in bulk, and the platform publishes through your CMS. Most tools on this list sell measurement instead. Temso AI and Conductor are the two that also act on what they find, so if the content machine is why you looked at AirOps, start there rather than with a pure tracker.
Next, check agent access at your plan level, not just on the feature page. PromptWatch ships a 59-tool MCP server and REST API on every plan including its free tier, and Peec AI and Omnia include MCP on every paid plan. Rankshift gates both behind the $189/mo Professional tier, and SE Visible has an API but no MCP at all.
The API vs MCP vs CLI guide explains why that distinction decides what your stack can automate. Finally, weigh model coverage against price. LLM Pulse tracks 10+ models from €49/mo and Rankshift covers 9, while Peec AI and SE Visible focus on three engines for around $95 to $99.
More engines is not automatically better: it matters only if your buyers are actually asking questions somewhere beyond ChatGPT, Google and Perplexity.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Mostly pricing visibility. AirOps publishes no price for any of its three plans , so you cannot compare it without a sales conversation, and billing runs on tasks, so the monthly figure moves with usage. The second reason is scope: AirOps is a content production platform, and plenty of teams only want the visibility tracking half.
Temso AI at $29/mo is the cheapest published entry point here, followed by LLM Pulse at €49/mo . PromptWatch has a genuine free tier (Explore), so it is the cheapest way to test the category at zero cost before paying $95/mo for Essential.
PromptWatch (59 tools, on every plan including free), Peec AI (every paid plan), Temso AI , LLM Pulse , Profound and Conductor all ship MCP servers. Rankshift includes one but only from its $189/mo Professional plan, and SE Visible has a REST API with no MCP server.
Conductor and Temso AI are the closest. Conductor pairs AI visibility with content generation inside a full enterprise SEO platform, and Temso runs an agent that acts on the visibility data it collects. The rest of this list is measurement and analysis, so you would pair them with your own writing workflow.
Conductor if you want one platform for AI search and traditional SEO with SSO and a dedicated account manager, and Profound if you want the most established pure AI-visibility analytics. Both are credible enterprise buys, though Conductor keeps its pricing behind sales in the same way AirOps does.
Not quite. LLM Pulse covers 10+ models and Rankshift covers 9, while Peec AI (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) and SE Visible (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) focus on the three that carry most volume. Check the specific engines against where your buyers actually ask questions before paying for breadth you will not use.
Still considering AirOps?
Check it out before committing to an alternative.
More on AirOps
Joonas Rotko
Author & founder of That Marketing Buddy
I score marketing software for AI-stack fit (MCP, API, agent-readiness), backed by 10+ years in digital marketing. I track 60+ tools so you can find the right fit.
This page may contain affiliate links. I earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never influences the recommendations.